A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The education system in any social community has been an integral factor for passing on knowledge and information. This system has provided the young and uprising generations to understand the global scenarios, gain historical and geographical information and provide basic knowledge to evolve and growth in ones interests. The monitoring of such an important basis of knowledge into a single national curriculum may hinder the advancements of the future generations.
The standardization of the national curriculum will provide an easy way to monitor and change the curriculum according to the advancements in technology. With such a nationalization, the modifications will be known to all the students and this would help them in advancing their basic knowledge. Moreover, a nationwide common curriculum would even boost the ease of taking general entrance tests. Such a move could help the students to know what the national entrance test curriculum would include. Furthermore, this would even benefit the college curriculum as it could be modified to teach the students from the advanced level following the prior education
However, on the contrary, the nationalization of educational curriculum would hindrance in different prospects. The generalization of a nation's curriculum would need the students to adapt their learning skills to the level at which the curriculum might fins to be the national learning skills of the nation. This would not be beneficial to the students who might be below average in learning skills and might even cause problems for the excelling students who wouldn't find it challenging for their innate skills. Additionally, such a decision could even see the educational system being easily corrupted under the political influence. The governing parties of the nation could easily filter reality and the informations provided to the students, influencing the young generations according to their convenience. Moreover, a common national curriculum would be catastrophic for the students would might plan to travel abroad for education. The knowledge and informations provided would differ nation-wise.
To conclude, providing a same national curriculum would boost in the modifications to update the curriculum, however, this decision could easily be corrupted and hinder the varied educational growth in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...basic knowledge to evolve and growth in ones interests. The monitoring of such an im...
^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...rent prospects. The generalization of a nations curriculum would need the students to a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...problems for the excelling students who wouldnt find it challenging for their innate sk...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64507042254 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16777565786 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461971830986 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5097083611 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220616106231 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936407622262 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690956850947 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144006665649 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544636172266 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.