Professor appear in TV
In this set of materials, the reading passage says about professor that appears in TV. The authors has a opnion that is a great benefit to the professors themselves as well as to their universities and general public. However, the professor in the lecture does not agree with statement in the passage and refutes each of the reasons.
First, in the passage the author claims that professors benefit from appearing on television because by doing so they so they acquire reputations as authorities in their academic fields among a much wider audience than they have on campus. The professor opposes this point saying that is not good when a prefessor appears in a TV program since is not a serious and don't discusses academic topics.
Second, the authors says that universities also benefit such appearances. In the lecture the professor doesn’t agree and say that this is not true.
Third, the author affirm that the public gains from professor appearing on television. The professor disagree with this statement and says that the informations in TV is not intectual, they have a background and the informations that they usually pass in TV is not materials that it used in lecture.
- government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 50
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 50
- "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” 60
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Professor appear in TV 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ofessor that appears in TV. The authors has a opnion that is a great benefit to the...
^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sor that appears in TV. The authors has a opnion that is a great benefit to the p...
^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...es as well as to their universities and general public. However, the professor in the lecture ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'so they'.
Suggestion: so they
...ppearing on television because by doing so they so they acquire reputations as authorities in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...a TV program since is not a serious and dont discusses academic topics. Second, t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sor doesn't agree and say that this is not true. Third, the author affir...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not materials that it used in lecture.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03015075377 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79221592756 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9834283903 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404824754201 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181965662856 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123338793925 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264119231554 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11371310549 0.0443174109184 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.