Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In companies it is one of the most important tasks of employers to motivate their workers in order to increase the effectiveness of them and the overall benefit of the company. For centuries many economist have attempted hard to find most influential method of motivating and paying extra money for distinctive contributions has usually been on the top list of such methods. But many people claim that, this motivating style is not perfect, because although it is stimuli for workers getting prize, it usually affects the others’ working desire negatively. I don’t completely agree with this opi...
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 77
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on web 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 90
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 55
- he three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001. 80
Sentence: As we all know, competition usually trigger improvement and as a result of this fact, it can be said that money awards usually cause total rise in the general success rate of company.
Description: The fragment competition usually trigger is rare
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1495 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.792 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.592 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.671 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5