As, the technology is growing very fast people are getting more benefits like internet, easy access for shopping e.t.c. In my opinion, I don't agree with the statement that people are less happy as the world is changing. This is because people are getting more job opportunities and are able to communicate with the world very easily.
To begin with, people are more happy with the changing world because they are getting more job opportunities. For instance, in the past, as there is no technology there are no jobs. But at present everyone is getting a work because of the improvements in the society or the world. Hence, people are spending time very happy with their families with the salary from the job. Moreover, people were also able to visit another place to see the constructions of the buildings and modern changes in the world. Which is also increasing happiness in them.
Second, at present people are enjoying the transportation facility. In the past, there is no such facility, and it is costlier only the rich people can buy a car. But, now everyone was able to effort for a car. Which increased easy access to go to any place within less time. Furthermore, at present shopping, communication e.t.c has become very convenient because of the changing world. And there are benefits like people can sit at home and can shop whatever they want, and at the same time, they can communicate with the other persons with mobile phones, tablets e.t.c. which is giving more happiness and enjoyment to the people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people are feeling more happy with the changing world because of all the above benefits they were getting from the changing world.
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 81
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 66
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ss for shopping e.t.c. In my opinion, I dont agree with the statement that people ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ldings and modern changes in the world. Which is also increasing happiness in them. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90657439446 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56047414073 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7634467672 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301745425952 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110293389889 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785789531219 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221179148226 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455745178596 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.