Agree/Disagree
Governments shoud spend money to improve internent access than to improve public transportaion
In today's convoluted world, governors are overwhelmed with multifarious issues in order to manage the society effectively. In this regard, there is a controversial debate among individuals about the different policies of spending money on social problems. Some people may hold the view that devoting budgets for developing public transportations can aid the society in a superior way, while some others take the opposing viewpoint. I firmly believe that society's budgets should be spent on enhancing the quality and the number of services of public transportation than internet access. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to mention is that allocating budgets on public transportation can enhance the quality of life in cities. It is obvious that public transportation systems such as subways, bus services, and even taxi services bring with it lots of advantages from dropping out the unemployment rate to enhancing the quality of air and even assisting the community for having economic growth. It would be no exaggeration if someone says that the merits of establishing public transportation services outnumber the benefits of enhancing internet access. By way of illustration, take my own experience as an example. During recent years, Tehran -the capital of Iran- has had the opportunity to develop its subway stations from 12 to more than 76. Recently, I read a paper about the results of this project. The consequences showed that this project has employed more than 2300 persons for their services, reduced the emission of PM1.0 -the main pollutant of air pollution in Tehran, as a result of using private cars- to less than 12 PPM.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that allocating money for increasing people's access can provide some social problems. No one can neglect the fact that although internet access has helped individuals to enhance their general knowledge, it has brought with it some social problems. In other words, the internet has opened doors for committing more crimes, developing bad literature and even imitating unappropriated behaviors of celebrities by juveniles. According to a recent study that has been published in Time magazine, there is a direct relationship between juvenile delinquency and accessing to the internet. To put it briefly, the more youngsters have access to a wide variety of information, the more they are inclined to deal with improper activities. The results of this study revealed that more than two third of young persons living in California spending more than 3 hours on watching video clips on YOUTUBE. In addition, they tend to imitate some actions that they see for instance smoking like HOLLYWOOD stars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-10 | kheradmandi69 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 90
- Agree/DisagreeMovies and TV programs have more negative effects than negative effects on the way young children behave. 92
- Agree/DisagreeIn the past young depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them, today young people are better to make decisions about their own lives 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a superior way" with adverb for "superior"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lic transportations can aid the society in a superior way, while some others take the opposing vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, if, may, so, third, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29772727273 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93985772271 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565909090909 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3084587036 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.684210526 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122876016133 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368259987098 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334222353969 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876676603701 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00798841274477 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.