With the economic boom in the developing countries, increasing numbers of visitors will have a journey during the weekend or vacation. Therefore, the interesting discussion about whether the travel in group led by a tour guide can be the best way of travelling. As far as I am concerned, travelling alone may be a better choice, owing to more flexible timetable or visiting more places.
Most importantly, travelling alone is able to get a more flexible timetable for our journey. It is widely-known that setting a fixed timetable must be the first step for a group of people to travel. However, it is extremely difficult for a tour guide to set a plan, which is suitable or available for each one in the group. Thus, we may not get a satisfaction with the travelling plan in the group. Even though we are satisfied with plan at the beginning, we may want to change the schedule during the trip. For example, last time my friends and I went to the Yunnan province for a trip, but we decided to take a chance of bungie jumps, which was not included in our original plan. If we took a journey in a group with a tour guide, we may miss the most exciting and unforgettable experience of bungie jumps during the journey.
Additionally, visiting more places or somewhere which is not traditional scene spot may contribute to the reason of travelling alone. If we go to a travel agency to select a travelling plan for a specify destination like Sichuan province, there will be only several routines for us to choose, only including some traditional scenes like Jiuzhai valley. However, when planning a journey on our own, we find out that there are numerous kinds of wonderful scenes which travel agencies never mention on their journey. Besides, the ticket prices of most traditional scenes are more exorbitant than some infamous or new scenes, because more visitors in travelling groups will be lead to those scenes by their tour guides. Finally, some tour guides in China will plan a trip to shopping center for getting the commission, which will totally ruin your good mood during the journey.
Admittedly, travelling with a tour guide could be a more convenient and less concerning way for us, but we may not satisfy with the journey planned by a tour guide, due to less flexible timetable or visiting less places. Besides, planning the trip by ourselves also can enhance our ability of making a schedule or do a research about the journey.
All in all, it is safe to conclude that the travel in group led by a tour guide cannot be the best way of travelling.
- test 11
- reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option 76
- waiting until the class is over could be the best time to talk with teacher. 56
- human will have a longer average life span 71
- it is enough for the government to educate people about the importance of living a balanced and healthy life style 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... agency to select a travelling plan for a specify destination like Sichuan province, ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun places is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to less flexible timetable or visiting less places. Besides, planning the trip by o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... our ability of making a schedule or do a research about the journey. All in all, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72383073497 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71116943955 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472160356347 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7560462053 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9444444444 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15410221491 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633308260485 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516583656823 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116776215978 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345637122484 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.