The line graph shows the percentage of people live below poverty line in developing countries for year 1900 to 2050
The given linear layout reveals the information about that the percentage of people living by developing countries of population below to poverty line during the period 1900 to 2050
Overall, it is evident that either the data amount Maximum of brazil, and Mexico or minimum data ratio of India.
The Cristal shows that, the data amount of four counties china, india, Mexico, Brazil,and data was calibrated in per centum.In first country was china had data amount start from 10,and ended at 10. Although, In second country was india had been data ratio start from 12 , and last point at 35.
On other hand, In others two countury was data amount differ from others. Futhermore, In third country were data ratio started from 35 . Afterthat, this was dramatically incline . Nextly, In Brazil was third countury had data amount started from 80, and ended at 85 respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-15 | Raman Preet kaur | 56 | view |
- On ideas 11
- The bar chart below the results of survey conducted by personal department at a major company.the survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers :those age -from 18- 30 an those aged 45-60 and factors affecting their work performance. 78
- Now days people throw away old things and adapt new things .do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages. 11
- The pie chart below the main reason why agriculture land become less productive.the table shows how causes affected three region of the world during the 1990 56
- Nowadays more task at home and work me being performed by robots . Why do you think happening is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ur counties china, india, Mexico, Brazil,and data was calibrated in per centum.In fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...l,and data was calibrated in per centum.In first country was china had data amount...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... india had been data ratio start from 12 , and last point at 35. On other hand...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... country were data ratio started from 35 . Afterthat, this was dramatically inclin...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...m 35 . Afterthat, this was dramatically incline . Nextly, In Brazil was third countury ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Afterthat, this was dramatically incline . Nextly, In Brazil was third countury ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43366147629 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.4238577364 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133621407117 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620618810795 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108008996773 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128301932239 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190075733053 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.