rewarding system in companies
Both lecture and passage discuss rewarding system in business places. The passage states that this approach, getting rewards to employees in tied of their performance, increase the employees’ motivation to work harder and the productivity in any company. In the opposite, the professor denies this passage’s claim by giving some information.
To begin with, the professor refer to the feedback results of workers who experience the reward system. He says that these worker showed disapproval toward this system because they know after rewards more working is expected by managers. Furthermore, the professor states that it is true there are many uncontrolled studies showing more productivity in some companies through rewarding system deceivably, but in fact there are many studies showing opposite of this, decreasing productivity by applying such rewarding system.
The professor mention that such rewords means like punishment by employee. In fact the process of compensating their productivity with rewards make them to feel manipulating with their managers. Most of time, the worker don’t receive their expecting rewards, so they will be disappointed by this.
The professor also claims that rewarding system is likely to damage collaborating between workers and their supervisor. The workers will not be comfortable with their supervisor because they are those persons who will judge and calculate the workers’ performance. Hence, they will not talk about their problems with their supervisor and this lead to declining the productivity of workers and companies.
In conclusion, even though the reading state that rewarding system is an effective approach to improve productivity in companies, but the professor disagrees with this opinion and states an opposite result of this approach, decreasing productivity in companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-07 | nargess1981 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 83 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04571016566 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2473032612 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278820283796 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114649144959 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114928554599 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159295766149 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126329158703 0.0443174109184 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.