In the modern time, the importance of the education is increasing, while the university education enables students to have a promising future, whether those students who are admitted by the university yet cannot pay their tuition should be given free education by the government has become a question. From my perspective, the government should not offer the free access to universities for poor students. Meanwhile, those impoverished students should receive some help from the government.
First, It is not realistic for the government to offer the free university education to all the students who cannot afford their tuition. There are a considerable number of other things should be prior to helping the poor students such as the basic facilities, constructing public transportations and establishing public medicare which all need fundings from the government. For the government, the public's basic demanding should be considered first compared to the demand of individuals. It is not reasonable to ignore the basic need of the works who live in fairly low material living condition and turn to use a great amount of government budget to help the poor student to continue their education.
Second, the government does have the obligation to help students who cannot afford their tuitions since the right of being equally educated are the essential part of the social contract between the government and the public. If students meet the requirement of universities but lack of tuitions, the government should help. In effect, the funding for impoverished students is common in countries all over the world. In China, for instance, there are scholarships and profit-free loans for students who cannot afford their tuition. Additionally, the admission of universities usually would provide poor students with part-time jobs, and wages could be used as the daily expense. The government should view helping the poor student as one of their social commitments and there are plenty of precedents in the world.
Finally, if the government does offer the free education to all the students who cannot pay their tuition, it could be unfair to the student who paid the tuition by their own effort. To make things worse, the easy access could intrigue more poor students to enter the university, causing the government budget for their education to increase, and a doom circle is formed.
To sum up, the government should not offer the free university education since there is more public demand should be taken into account first. The government should, however, offer helps like the scholarship or the profit-free loans to the student who cannot afford their tuition.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 73
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 87
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 66
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'would' and 'provide'.
Suggestion: would usually provide
...tionally, the admission of universities usually would provide poor students with part-time jobs, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30751173709 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84213754376 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434272300469 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2329173609 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0588235294 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355798915164 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154695207797 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975743618968 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255129985333 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040792433099 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.