Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the ancient time , the cultures of various places could not be spread to distances due to the transportation hindrances. In the argument above the only evidence to support the archaeologists conclusions is that no palean boats were found that could have crossed the deep and broad river Brim which connected Palea to Lithos.
It could be possible that such boats were destroyed during any calamity and thus their evidence is not to be found. The archaeologist, to build a strong argument to support their conclusion should evaluate other evidences such as the material used to prepare the baskets, a certain distinguished sign of the Palean that they engraved only on the baskets that they made so that they can differentiate it from the baskets found in Lithos. Also the communities currently residing there can be interviewed so as to get to know more about the descent of preparing such baskets.
Evidences of other means of transport that could have been used in the ancient times can also be evaluated, as the Paleans could have developed means of communicating across the river for materials, and thus there tradition of woven baskets could be spread to the area of Lithos.
The distinctive pattern found on the baskets of Paleans could have been a trademark of the area instead of only the pre historic village and thus such baskets could have been created by the people of Lithos too.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-28 | Ly Phuong Thao | 60 | view |
2013-10-28 | Ly Phuong Thao | 40 | view |
2013-10-26 | hrithiksrf57 | 45 | view |
2013-09-25 | wasainika17 | 60 | view |
2013-09-10 | janet | 53 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 74
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 71
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 60
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 70
Sentence: The archaeologist, to build a strong argument to support their conclusion should evaluate other evidences such as the material used to prepare the baskets, a certain distinguished sign of the Palean that they engraved only on the baskets that they made so that they can differentiate it from the baskets found in Lithos.
Error: archaeologist Suggestion: archeologist
flaws:
No. of Words: 237 350
Minimum 250 words wanted. Better to have 400+ words.
better to use this pattern for argument essays:
para 1: introduction.
para 2: argument 1
para 3: argument 2
para 4: argument 3
para 5: conclusion
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 237 350
No. of Characters: 1143 1500
No. of Different Words: 119 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.924 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.823 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.666 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.299 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.47 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.739 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5