Leadership as an inherent skill has long been discussed by people. Some individuals with time and that being a good leader maybe acquired during the lifespan via gained knowledge and experience. Meanwhile, it is also believed that certain people are born to lead. Increasingly, more scientists have made researches on this topic, especially since the likelihood of leadership heritability.
Considering several studies conducted at Harvard University, it appeared that qualities of a leader are apparently a result of specific genetic traits. For example, particular genes are influences on human personality, namely, on extraversion or preferences. Moreover, genetic information stored in amino acid sequence control the amounts of chemicals (i.e. hormones) which can affect behavior of a person. Take for example an ordinary leader, in emergency they have to be reasonable and objective in order to cope with obstacles. In such situations, particular genotypes are favorable for leaders.
On the other hand, there are strong environmental influences on personality which are extremely helpful to improve skills in capacity as the leader. One bright example is, particularly, entrepreneurs create a future vision, and the ability of seeing underlying problems and undue risks can be learned through challenges and tense struggle. Furthermore, it is certainly possible to develop leadership qualities by learning how to exceed limits effectively or allocate sufficient finances. The majority of leaders are eloquent, which is also an acquirement that reached only by devoting enormous efforts.
Overall, despite having a slight hereditary disposition to become the leader, I am convinced that being a leader is principally a result of training and development.
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows information about Heart Attacks by Ages and Genders in USA 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 61
- The line graph shows changing patterns of business communication in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72519083969 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16757102619 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68320610687 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3450021829 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232599018187 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065424556072 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048394252721 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133464054729 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528171273923 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.