This topic raises the controversial issue whether getting informed about the past will not help people today's to make their decisions because they are not able to make connection between current events and past until there is some distance from both. Indisputably, the past achievements were not easy tasks or without basis. Therefore, I totally disagree that people will not get benefits from the knowing the past and the past events will help to shape the best decision. Hence, this essay will illustrate my reasons and examples clearly.
To begin with, it is irrefutable the role of history or the vivid impact of history in our today's life very important, and sometime we used to use past facts, experience to prove new events. On one hand, past knowledge and theoretical innovation process are the basis of current study. On striking example, we have all the facts about the flying mechanisms and using the past knowledge help us to build up real models such as planes. Further, the past science is guiding for significant scientific researches. For instance we know about penicillin as an antibiotic, bit by further research scientist has developed thousands of different kind of antibiotics.
Furthermore, the second vital point that should be taken into consideration the past success and failure is very useful. We can learn from their success stories while avoiding the failure one. Then, we can analysis their mistakes, find solutions and build up strong decisions. In addition, by deeper understanding we require in the past the more sagacious decisions we make in the present. For example, in the past they thought the sun revolve around the earth, but by examining the results they found that the earth revolve around the sun.
Last but not least, the contrary point of views states we cannot link between past and present until have distance from both, but this claim means that the both events became from the past with different time line, we cannot get benefits from two events happened on the past. Thus, hold their assumption depends on weak point.
In conclusion, due to aforementioned reasons and examples knowing the past events is a very crucial part of our present. Thus, we can learn from their success experiences, avoid the bad one, advance the current experiences and widen the horizon for our understanding.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined wit 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the earth revolve around the sun. Last but not least, the contrary point o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0826873385 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62350137213 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9981481196 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.277777778 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488114544109 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129776959211 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126978436802 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258447029196 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103102242113 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.