TPO 14 question 1
The reading claims that the salvage logging is a fruitful way to recover a ruined forest and for economic and provides three reasons of support. However te lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidences to refute them all.
The author argues that salvage logging help the forest recover by rapidly eliminating the remnant of dead trees. Conversely, the lecturer bring up the idea that the salvage logging cleaning process does not necessary right to creat a good condition for tree growth. Natural pocess of wood decaying would enrich the soil which make it more suitable for generating trees. So, rapid removal of dead trees woul increase nutrient of soil.
Furthermore, the reading posits that by removing dead part of trees, salvage logging would decrease the number of insect which inhabit within the wood and susequently their havoc to health of the forest. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that it is true that insect will be increased but is it bad (?). She also satates that a population of spruce bark beetles lived in forest for hundresd of years without any damages. Dead trees not only is the habitat for beetles, but also for birds and other insects which contributes to health of the forest and the removal of wood would increase the harmful effects on these animals.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that salvage logging is economically beneficial and and contribute to add more jobs for local residents. In contrast, the speaker dismissed the issue due to the fact that the effect of salvage logging on job and economic is so small and will not last for a long time because of machines which used to recover the forest are include helicopters and other wehicles that are so expensive. The effect of salvage logging on creating jobs is temporary in order to it fulfiiled othersides that are more expensive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | firouzeh96 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons of support. However te lecturer finds all the ideas dubious...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... growth. Natural pocess of wood decaying would enrich the soil which make it more...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing posits that by removing dead part of trees, salvage logging would decrease th...
^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Finally, the reading passage holds the view that salvage logging is economicall...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...vage logging is economically beneficial and and contribute to add more jobs for local r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, so, in contrast, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92405063291 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45507353903 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1576546266 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493562889573 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173167060785 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876360415534 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287263087275 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889484312627 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.