the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The charts compare the units of electricity generated by fuel sources in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000.
The first two charts show that the ratio of fuel source based energy, coal, natural gases and oil in aggregate,slightly changed between 1980 and 2000 in Australia, but comparing its component shows that usage of natural gas and oil decreased significantly, while coal consumption increased proportionaly.
the second two charts demonstrate that fuel source based energy has been decreased in France over this 20-year period. In fact,fuel source energy were the majority of the electricity in 1980, 70 of 90 units, but big portion of it has been replaced by nuclear power and in 2000 only 52 of 180 units is based on fuel sources.
Generally it can be concluded that between 1980 and 2000 France became more dependent on non-fuel source energy while Australia just changed the form of fuel source that they use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-26 | DanielDavarnia | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , slightly
...coal, natural gases and oil in aggregate,slightly changed between 1980 and 2000 in Austra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...paring its component shows that usage of natural gas and oil decreased significan...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...l consumption increased proportionaly. the second two charts demonstrate that fuel...
^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fuel
...France over this 20-year period. In fact,fuel source energy were the majority of the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...became more dependent on non-fuel source energy while Australia just changed the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00641025641 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7559257177 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3654883695 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.2 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311941432977 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202088372868 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945246683678 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228682887947 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917639567088 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.