A successful leader is one who understands the plight of his/her subjects and works towards the goal of mitigating them. The fundamental traits of a successful leader include copperation, empathy and also, contrary to the given claim, a sense of apppreciation for healthy competition.
Cooperation is definitely one of the most important traits for someone in a leadership position. A cooperative leader would always be trusted by his/her fellow beings. For example, a recent study involving a number of corporates showed how the retention and the happiness quotient go hand in hand with the increasing levels of cooperation provided by the upper management. The respondents said that they felt their needs were being taken care of by the company while working towards the vision of the firm.
While cooperation lets the leaders develop inter-personal bonds with those in their organization or society, it is not the only deciding factor in the creation of leadership characteristics in the youth. Without competition, there would be no reason or push to motivate the leader to outperform themselves. This would ultimately lead to the stagnation in the situation of the individuals in the society as well as the society as a whole.
However, competition can be both healthy and unhealthy. Healthy competition pushes the leaders to perform even better than they are doing now. Furthermore, it also instills a spirit of equal opportunities being available to everyone in the society. Unhealthy competition, however, ultimately leads to envy.
For example, in the Indian epic Mahabharata, Yuddhisthir is an epitome of a great leader in the epic. Duryodhana - the eldest of the Kauravas, strives to compete with the eldest Pandava Yuddhishthir to establish his own supremacy as the most powerful ruler in the region of Hastinapur. However, his sense of competition is striken by envy resulting from the prosperous kingdom of the Pandavas. Several analyses, including one by the renowned thinker Emmanuel Kant, have repeatedly underlined how Hastinapur could have prospered further had Duryodhana's spirit of competition been healthy. The analyses say that healthy competition would have led both the leaders to strive for improving their own selves, while also provide the best for their subjects.
In a nutshell, it can be said that cooperation and healthy competition are the two pillars of successul leadership in a society or organization.
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 66
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into majo 18
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 75
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 24
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, still, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39322916667 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12096485983 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0730481059 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141036538559 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430859928598 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409229410796 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725379569155 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218534082577 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.