In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many
people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although technology has reduced the distance among people; it has gradually increased the hatred feeling between human beings as well. In current days, violence is one of the biggest threat across all the nations. In continuation to this notion, some analysts opine that the gun-related mortalities have increased in many countries because people own such arms in their living places whereas some people think that man or other species killing with guns is not concerned with its presence at home. I am a strong advocate of the former view which states that shooting is increasing in many countries because of the availability of guns in a house. In this essay, I will discuss my viewpoints.
Man killing with guns by civilians is the major crime with which police force is dealing nowadays. There are two major causes of this. First and foremost is easy ownership of the gun and the other one is the lack of patience in human beings. Nowadays, people are very revengeful, and they react very promptly when in anger neglecting the consequences, and if a gun is available in a house; an angry person wouldn't think the second time before using it. For example, in Australia, a citizen of Australia shot an Indian immigrant with his owned gun because the later one took his job. This incident could have been avoided if the citizen was not having a gun at home.
Furthermore, shooting of animals has also increased. The major reasons for this could be the easy accessibility of pistol within their families and very simple methods of using it. In ancient times, only royal families used to go out for hunting as it was very expensive. Nowadays, many citizens are having the hobby of animal shooting because the arms are often existing in homes these days. For instance, tigers are endangered in India because of enormous tiger shooting.
To recapitulate, the above-mentioned facts prove that the main factors of shooting in many countries are the easy availability of guns at home. In my opinion, the government should limit the license of its usage. The legal authorities should first take a psychology test and background verification before giving the license. Moreover, the government should limit the supplies of arms to citizens as well. This would help in controlling gun shooting within many countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-27 | harmankaur1607 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 67
- Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it is wiser to marry for money. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge a 78
- You recently used a taxi and left some important documents there. Write a letter to the taxi manager and say:– Describe what you left and where it happened.– Why are these papers important?– What would you like the manager to do about it? 87
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 67
- Social media marketing can influence what consumers buy Do you agree or disagree To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s available in a house; an angry person wouldnt think the second time before using it. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99224806202 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68898280047 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6493312859 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191776232155 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523519473627 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552119588829 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117166499756 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286545066101 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.