Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. U

It is obvious that education plays a vital role in development of a country. I strongly believe that it is much better for governments to assign much more money to universities than to the education of very young children. In the following paragraphs I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.

I think universities in comparison to the primary schools needs to much more budgets. Many important research projects and inventions happen in universities and thus they need well-equipped laboratories and libraries. Having access to more education facilities in universities helps students achieve their goals easier. Therefore, universities have considerable effects on development of country in various fields. Students in universities should be trained perfectly because in the future they enter industries and other important parts in society and affect their country. For example, when I was a student at university, I was a member of a research group in our university. We have access to advanced instructional facilities and we could carry out important projects which helps solve some problems of industry. It is clear if government does not invest enough money in universities, students will not be capable of doing research and will not help the advancement of country.

Moreover, I believe that if a country allocates more budgets to universities and improves its conditions, it encourages foreign intelligent students to apply to its universities. As a result, universities can attract a lot of invest for country and make progress in scientific fields. In addition to attract students, it helps to attract distinguished professors to these universities. Hence, it influences a country’s scientific development. For instance, in my country there are several high-ranked universities which attract genius students from all over the world annually. This way, our country has made much progress in different aspects.

To sum up, in my point of view, government should pay a lot more attention to universities than elementary schools and dedicate more money to universities. universities need to more instructional facilities compared to primary schools; also, if universities are well-equipped, it helps them to attract genius students around the world. Consequently, is has significant effects on development of a country.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...comparison to the primary schools needs to much more budgets. Many important resea...
^^
Line 3, column 983, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll not help the advancement of country. Moreover, I believe that if a country al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Universities
...nd dedicate more money to universities. universities need to more instructional facilities c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt effects on development of a country.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55277777778 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33913268661 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4337748564 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.95 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193623526929 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061197922426 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658942389746 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145133000419 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789956759667 0.0645574589148 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.