It is obvious that education is one of the most important parts of humans’ life. without a proper education, people are not able to achieve their objectives in their life. undoubtedly teachers play a vital role in training children and thus assessment of teachers’ performance in schools directly affect students’ learning efficiency. I strongly believe that it is much better for students to evaluate their teachers by themselves instead of rating teachers by their colleagues. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my views using some reasons and examples.
I think that there are different criteria in order to assess teachers. Also, for the purpose of increasing students’ efficiency, it is crucial for students to judge their instructors by themselves. Students know their teacher better than others and are in direct contact with them. they are well aware of abilities and knowledge of their teachers to teach as well their weakness points. As a result, student’s evaluation positively affect improvement of teachers’ performance and thus would be helpful for them. for instance, we had a teacher in high school who used old materials to teach students and children are not satisfied with this issue. Therefore, after the process of assessment, he changed his instructional material and used newer ones.
Moreover, if teachers are assessed by their colleagues, it cannot be useful for students. In other words, it is not reasonable to evaluate teachers using this method because they are not well aware of their teaching methods and their behavior traits in classroom. In addition, it is possible that other teachers judge each other based on their relationships. That is, if there is a good friendship between them, they assess each other very good and vice versa. As a result, it is better for both teachers and students to allow students to measure their instructors’ performance and quality of teaching. For instance, when I was in university, one of our teachers had good behavior towards other staff and faculty. Therefore, they judge greatly, whereas, in point of view of students she are not able to convey lessons to students perfectly and thus the grades of students were low and children did not have enough productivity. Therefore, criteria which students consider are completely different from teachers to assess a teacher’ performance.
To sum up, according to above arguments and mentioned points, I believe that in order to increase in and improve in students’ efficiency, teachers should be evaluated by students rather than other teachers.
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 83
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 70
- A high school that normally gives students about two months of time off from school during the summer is introducing a new educational requirement for students in eleventh grade (ages 16-17) over the summer, students have the following two options to fulf 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...t important parts of humans' life. without a proper education, people are not able...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
...achieve their objectives in their life. undoubtedly teachers play a vital role in training ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...rs and are in direct contact with them. they are well aware of abilities and knowled...
^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...nce and thus would be helpful for them. for instance, we had a teacher in high scho...
^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...havior traits in classroom. In addition, it is possible that other teachers judge...
^^
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ereas, in point of view of students she are not able to convey lessons to students ...
^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by students rather than other teachers.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38834951456 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0870962196 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502427184466 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0958036381 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468790823814 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155118407493 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974794439567 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310161063618 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103719337029 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.