“In order for any work---whether film, literature, sculpture, or a song---to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your rea

Any form of art whether film, literature, sculpture, song have been existing from time immemorial. It has not only improved wisdom of mankind but also provided us with entertainment. The success of any art form lies with its ability to communicate to the masses. Any such form devoid of that will not be given due admiration from the masses. Such art forms take a beating due to its ambiguity.

My candid opinion is that any work---whether film, literature, sculpture, or a song---to have merit, it must be understandable to the majority. Many pit falls in the assembling of the particular art form will have a boomeranging effect to the art form.

There are many sculptures but only few of them get noticed. People will always follow sculptures best which can be perceived by them effortlessly. There is always a distinction between the best sculpture and the rest. Ambiguity of any sort on part of the artist will back fire their work even if it was done with maximum effort by them.

The films directed by many knowledgeable directors still couldn’t conceive their ideas to the masses, which gave them loses instead. There are many old melodies song still afresh in our minds. Even though the pop music is on a high now-a-days they lack the strong influence on people and according to me they don’t haunt us, they are ephemeral.

Many films are remembered by us which are ‘classics’ since it is comprehendable to the majority. Therefore in order in order to have merit the particular art form must be lucid, to the people.