Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The idea that those in power should step down after five years so that the success could be achieved through revitalisation through new leadership, is not completely accurate. There are some elements which make it a good practice but there are also some down sides to it.
Starting with the benefits of changing the top leadership after every 5 years. A new leadership will come up with new ideas for growth and development for their respective field, thus there will not be dearth of ideas for improvement.
Other than new ideas, the chances of corruption will be also decreased. As someone in power will be always afraid that if he/she will indulge in corruption, the next leadership will catch that and the scam will be exposed. So this fear will constantly check on the bad acts in which a person in power could indulge.
Advocating the benefits, I can oversee the downsides of the idea being discussed. Firstly, 5 years is not a very long time period. If there is a leader with good ideas and clear intentions then the person should be given more time to stay in his/her position. The good example for this point is elected lawmakers. If public think that their last tenure was satisfactory then the public could elect that person again. Secondly, sometimes there are some long term plans which won't be get completed if there will always be a change in the leadership.
In conclusion, we can say that the change in the leadership is necessary, but it should be after 5 years only does not look very promising.
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 37
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le for this point is elected lawmakers. If public think that their last tenure was...
^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears only does not look very promising.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74060150376 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55307447407 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1490765395 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0714285714 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164465978324 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593969061724 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709021414902 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111032908599 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786560402337 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.