The past century humankind has rather ignored the nature and the effects their actions have on the environment. Today we are in a place where we cannot ignore these undesirable effects anymore: sealevels are rising, the oceans are full of micro-plastic and many endangered species. Human activities and ambition has destroyed both nature and its wildlife. It is time that we take action now and we stop destroying our own planet by preserving remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
First, let's have a look at today's typical city - different neighbourhoods all linked by many roads. The car has a central place and the remaining green areas are being replaced by more neighbourhoods. What we tend to forget is that these green areas produce a healthier living environment as the photosynthesis of the plants and trees takes in the (undesired) CO2 and releases fresh oxygen. As the wilderness areas will be able to develop in their natural state, greenery will also develop and the effects of this photosynthesis will be remarkable.
Second, imagine a world with only humans and no free-living animals - this is the world that we are currently going to. A world were the only animals alive are owned by people in order to produce their food. More and more animal species are dying because we, humankind, are taking their place. By preserving these areas we ensure that there are always some areas left where animals can just be animals. This ethical reason is of utmost importance and far too often ignored.
Third, people could argue that these areas are dangerous as animals will have their fighting instincts. Therefore it is important that these areas are regulated very well and are clearly demarcated. These areas could be supervised by students of the nearby university that keep inventatory of the wildlife and its habits. Preserving wildlife and nature will push the knowledge we have forward.
In conclusion, it is of utmost importance to live in a world where there is space for both the animals as the humans. As the system of the planet is based on two species working together to produce oxygen, food and knowledge. Let us change the mentality of the past century where money, efficiency and robots took over the human dimension that needs nature to function.
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 82
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...als will have their fighting instincts. Therefore it is important that these areas are re...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00261780105 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66603462358 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4013932812 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.55 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126530001564 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404441501358 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423936463743 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721650623377 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349812197799 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.