The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts illustrates the mean household expenditures of Japanese people and Malasian people in the year of 2010.
As seen clearly, Other good and services was the number one expenditure of japanese people, with 21 percent occupying in househole expenditures, just ahead of food expenditure, which was occupied by 24 percent. Housing was third most expenditure of japanese people, with 21 percent occupying in household expenditure, it almost near as transport, which was occupied by 20 percent.
Furthermore, In Malasia, Housing was the first position in houlsehold expenditures of Malasian people, with 34 percent occupying, just ahead of food, which was occupied by 26 percent. other good and services was third on the list , with 27 percent expenditure, although this was now here near as popular as either food and housing.
Overall, Good and Services, Housing occupied most expenditure in both the countries in year of 2010, In contrast both countries people were less disposed towards Healthcare nand transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Hoangnhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | lordwind | 81 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | subashtimalsina112 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Muhammed_10 | 56 | view |
- "A recent study of Dura-Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the E 26
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on incomein order to provide security for their family.Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job?What other factors should be considered? 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...food, which was occupied by 26 percent. other good and services was third on the list...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... good and services was third on the list , with 27 percent expenditure, although t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.475 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96167148975 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7848768486 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838234126877 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618540908208 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719516410698 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834104889732 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078658587381 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.