Welfare of a nation depends upon many factors. The above topic is debatable as some believe that citizens' welfare is not an important aspect whereas, others' believe that condition of people decides the eminence of the nation. I agree with the latter. There are certain reasons to it which I am going to explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, if people of a nation are happy and satisfied than only the country can progress. I would like to explain this with help of an example. There are two countries Switzerland and Myanmar. Switzerland has free education and provide good health care to the populace. These are basic human rights which make people contented. Thus, the country is peaceful and making progress. While Myanmar does not provide basic human rights. So, the public are not happy which in turn is the result that the country is under developed.
Besides this, there is one more example to substantiate my point. India is achieving success in the field of science such as the successful Mars mission or the possession of nuclear bombs etc. However, a significant portion of population still falls below the poverty line and this is a prime issue which needs to be addressed. My point here is that citizens of a nation should be given standard living which is their human right then only the country can progress.
Lastly, this cannot be denied that achievements of artists or scientist contributes in the greatness of the nation it can be said that contribution of them and welfare of people are interrelated. There are rulers who are famous because during their reign people had better standard of living thus, it can be said that both things are connected to each other.
In conclusion, I would like reiterate my point that people of a nation can be compared to the atoms of an element. A nation is an element and its building blocks are atoms that is its citizens.
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 62
- Claim: Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidane for students.Reason: College students-like people in general-prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decis 50
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 80
- Young People enjoy life more than older people do 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ountry is peaceful and making progress. While Myanmar does not provide basic human ri...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cess in the field of science such as the successful Mars mission or the possessio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, lastly, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81097560976 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52876814915 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2487830531 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199358112409 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561332073605 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456279992692 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111013852072 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027220442827 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.