Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals have been imminent in the society from times immemorial. A sandal represents any illegitimate or unethical behavior or events that are unacceptable to the people of the society. Scandals also represent the reality of something or someone to public in democratic country. Now a day’s mass media is most powerful weapon in some countries; So many scandals come in light due to mass media and the reality get Ubiquitous. I am totally agreed with the statement that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problem in ways that no reformer ever could. I am representing some arguments to favor the statement.
Firstly, scandals are eye opener for the public and also bring attention towards the flaws of policies and superstitious beliefs. In India recently the Ram Rahim Baba's scandal comes in front of public and everyone amazed with his did which loose the superstitious believe of public. There are so many reformers already worked to highlights the reality but it was not effective, which happened in few days due to mass media and people supervised with the news of scandal. Similarly in the 1970s the Watergate scandal of the US leads to the resignation of the president Richard Nixon.
Secondly, In India government launched a scheme to distribute food grain to people living below poverty line (BPL) but there was a food grain scam in the state of UP (2002-2010) found in which food grain worth 35,000 crores was sold in open market. These scandal gave information about the political party which did the scam and people of UP got cautious about in next election which leader will be selected.
Thirdly, the scandals represent the flawless of the scheme or we can say the personal benefit of a particular group of society. The coal-gate scam where in coal blocks meant for auctioning were allocated to influential people signifies how corruption has strongly gnawed into the very assets of the social system. In any democratic country government work for benefits of the people but these scandals give real face of government.
Conclusively, scandals play a pivotal role in addressing certain significant issues of the society. It is the responsibility of the society to bring out the best of such situations so that the society grows stronger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-04 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 53 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper."Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists 23
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mention advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sl 25
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. Duri 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...h his did which loose the superstitious believe of public. There are so many reformers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'highlight'.
Suggestion: highlight
...are so many reformers already worked to highlights the reality but it was not effective, w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...le supervised with the news of scandal. Similarly in the 1970s the Watergate scandal of t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scandal' or 'These scandals'?
Suggestion: This scandal; These scandals
... 35,000 crores was sold in open market. These scandal gave information about the political pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77125083523 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.760879484 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.411764706 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907170417077 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281248837176 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322235892817 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463479587641 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255750014549 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.