If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of study a particular area of climate change and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study a particular area of climate change can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, nice condition with the best climate can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, bad weather situations might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the climate changing could relate to this reality that the demerits of clumsy weather pertain to change people feeling. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of good climate conditions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 88
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 88
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65808823529 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16632494324 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658088235294 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6706303224 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135104174958 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473084349319 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763385919247 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758059032773 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822406785631 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.