The reading article and lecture talks about buzzing- an advertisement technique to hire ordinary people to promote products. The passage points out three disadvantages of buzzing. The speaker who works as a buzzer, contests all the claims presented in the text.
First, the reading avers that, consumers should know that the buzzers are getting paid to praise the products. Sometimes paid advertisement may spread incorrect information. The guest lecturer refutes this claim and points out that, buzzers are ordinary people and are not like paid actors. Even though they get benefited to promote the products; buzzers tell their own personal experiences when they use the actual products. They will promote the products only if the product is true to its promise. They tell their true experiences.
Next, the text argues that, buzzers don't reveal their identity as paid advertisers and unknowingly consumers get lobbied and it can be harmful to consumers. However, the speaker refutes the argument and states that, people ask lot of questions about products and if buzzers don't give satisfactory information then people won't buy the products. So consumers do not take buzzers words blindly and but products.
Lastly, the article posits that, buzzing will harm social relationships and people will lose trust in general. The speaker, ridicules the assumption that the buzzing will harm civilization. He further adds that, buzzers will promote only genuine products and people will get a good experience and that will promote more trust and people will be open to more people.
In conclusion, the speaker rejects all the claims presented in the reading and stresses that the claims are misleading and give wrong impression about buzzing.
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 76
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 81
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 83
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nts out three disadvantages of buzzing. The speaker who works as a buzzer, contests...
^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... Next, the text argues that, buzzers dont reveal their identity as paid advertise...
^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...questions about products and if buzzers dont give satisfactory information then peop...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63511192856 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6171211532 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362823141828 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118451424321 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451849950068 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178026899125 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891347468231 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.