Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The idea of not being flexible in decision making as a political leader sounds unreasonable since based on different political, economic, social circumstances, one should change his way.
As world change permanently, it is crucial for a man of politics to change his way of thinking according to the time and condition of his community. The good example is Iran whose political leaders have/had insisted on not negotiating with the USA about nuclear energy leading to many sanctions from the USA and Europe countries which put Iran in a dire economic circumstance. Eventually, after almost 40 years, those negotiations not only helps Iran’s economics but also improves the image of Iran throughout the world. All people around the world find out that the government of Iran is looking for peace and also use nuclear energy for useful use not for making nuclear bombs. As you see, having yielding strategies cause good effects.
On the other hand, some disciplines might become obsolete over the time and a leader should be capable of modifying them based on the needs of society. The example of individuals who are homosexual and want to get married is a convincing one. There are still many countries with strict regulation in which being homosexual or getting married is invalidating laws and has huge consequences. Therefore, those people are obliged to migrate to another country or have a hidden life in their/his own country. Why should a government make people lives harder than easier?
It worths to says that in some cases having immutable rules is necessary for making long-term decisions and plans. Consider a country whose laws about import or export are constantly changing over the time. In this circumstance, businesses have to change day by day leading to do their jobs inefficient or maybe with a huge cost that was not considered before. Therefore, these businesses would not be profitable and ought to end their working leading to a huge economic detriment. So, a stable situation is always a critical factor for boosting a company.
To sum up, not only do decisive and unchangeable strategies may hurt the economic and political conditions of a country, lacking stable laws and conditions also may cause lots of problems. It is better that leaders pay attention to the need of the society and make decisions which are best and effective according to the current time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yswang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | sudesh tiwari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Daffodilia | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.” 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meetin 60
- tpo41 - writing1 83
- TPO 41 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.” 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fective according to the current time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80177308233 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4632251986 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123536767575 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037433220055 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031759933501 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703190000265 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181516446442 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.