The author suggests that planting genetically modified trees which is the product of the process that changes the gene of the organism will bring many benefits to people. Nevertheless, the professor cast doubts each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the reading states the genetically modified trees are more resistance to the disasters such as a virus. Also, the author includes an example of the Hawaii where they use genetically modified trees to block viruses. On the other hand, the lecturer rejected this point by saying that if those trees meet with the situation that they have not been designed, they will die eventually. Furthermore, the lecturer said the only one situation could not prove that this is resistance to all hard times such as a hurricane or the climate change.
Secondly, the passage indicates the genetically modified trees grow faster and produce greater yields of fruit and products than the natural trees which will beneficial for farmers. Nonetheless, the professor made a counterclaim to this idea by explaining that the seed of the genetically modified tree will be more costly than the casual one because they need more techniques to produce. Moreover, she argued that farmers must buy seeds every time they plant the tree because they can not collect seed from the former one like the natural trees.
Thirdly, the article claims that such tree encourages to save the endangered natural trees that are used in many industries. However, the lecturer refused that point, the genetically modified trees have a more bad impact on the growth of those natural ones. She said the genetically modified trees deplete resources such as water, sunlight and soil nutrients that are directly related to the population of the natural trees.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
..., the professor cast doubts each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the readi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: saving
...rticle claims that such tree encourages to save the endangered natural trees that are u...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14878892734 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56788439068 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8386623944 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509009193196 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20177733538 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114530611069 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310502936992 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696377277161 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.