In any field – business, politics, education, government – those in power should be required to step down after five years. Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The duration of time that a nation gives an official to stay in the position of power depends on multiple criteria. As the statement claims a five-year period is considered to be a sufficient deadline in any field such as business, politics, education, and government. It is evident that new managers in every field will bring up new ideas and solutions, however getting adopted to a position and learning about its weaknesses to be improved takes time. Therefore, I partially agree with the statement and I believe that the duration should be adjusted according to the requirements of the field.
First and foremost, the main reason of changing old managers with new ones lies behind the fact that new employees are more motivated to prove themselves which lead to working relentlessly. People who are entrusted in power can implement their new ideas derived from evaluation of the recent manager. One can analyze weaknesses and mistakes of the businessman, politician, instructor or official during five years and evolve the system by new solutions after being assigned to the position. Additionally, universities normally present fresh experts in various fields each four years to the society. People who have recently graduated from the university are passionate and vigorous to apply whatever they have learned about new technologies and methodologies to the society.
Following that, needs of society changes during five years and new officials who have lived among people are more familiar with those newly raised requirements. For example, wrong decisions of a politician may ruin the life of young generation who are in the age of twenty to twenty-five for five years. This type of mistake is uncompromising since the time is past and unfavorable economic situations caused by wrong decisions of a politician had side effects on the future life of numerous people. furthermore, the soaring rate of changes in this competitive world do not let us to waste time on wrong paths. If a businessman is guiding a profligate business, he should quickly be replaced by a wise and prudent businessman who can prevent the huge loss of the company.
On the contrary, some other fields such as education require long periods of time to reveal the true abilities of its experts. It is evident that the majority of researchers choose a specific research interest and follow that to the rest of their life since being expert in scientific fields requires great amount of efforts and studying on the subject. A person who is doing research as an associate professor in a university has allocated more than ten years of research to that specific field of area to achieve that position. The more the person acquires experience the more sophisticated he becomes in that field. Therefore, changing people in education after five years does not seem to be reasonable decision.
To summarize, assigning people in the position of power should be controlled and appropriate deadlines are needed. Depending on the field that they are working on, this deadline should be adjusted. Spending longer periods may result in profit in some cases and loss in some others. Therefore, the features of the field ought to be evaluated meticulously.
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. “An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby Eas 49
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of KNOW radio station. “Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock-and-roll music station. Consider, for example, that the number of people in our listening area over 49
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both. 66
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. 41
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants. “Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have com 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
... on the future life of numerous people. furthermore, the soaring rate of changes in this co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, such as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2699.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12144212524 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8718574255 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514231499051 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 868.5 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0689415271 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.347826087 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183804040825 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552404758685 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437723205003 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107332750018 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446445042939 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.