The reading and lecture tells us about the painting of an elderly women and argues about its creator, who by the lecture is definitely Rembrandt and contradicts the reading which tells the different story. The reading tells us about many aspects of painting which can’t be associated with Rembrandt but lecture tells us about some hidden facts.
Firstly, the dressing of the women in reading is told to be both representing a servants cloths and also the cloths of higher standard lady which is different than the paintings of Rembrandt but the lecture tells us about deep assessment of painting that the some part of the painting is added later to increase its value. So, after removing the added layer it is definitely a Rembrandt painting.
Secondly, the reading argues about the use of light and shadow in the painting by giving the examples like face and fur collar. The lecture contradicts the statement by telling us that by removing the added coating of paint, we can see the more realistic light and shadow usage in the painting.
Lastly, the lecture tells us about the back of the painting is attached later to make the painting more grand by joining several wood panels to it. The original painting of old lady is drawn on a single wood panel which also matches to the wood of other painting by Rembrandt which comes from the same tree.
In conclusion, the painting is indeed drawn by Rembrandt by taking in consideration the facts shown by the lecture and which contradicts the statements told in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...higher standard lady which is different than the paintings of Rembrandt but the lect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ut deep assessment of painting that the some part of the painting is added later to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g is added later to increase its value. So, after removing the added layer it is definite...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85931558935 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52854283986 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433460076046 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0811599593 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356114718723 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183652895329 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541751918699 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229450168618 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575556065427 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.