Since the dawn of civilization, people have been concerned about choosing and making friends. This issue has been an inevitable part of an individual's life. The advent of technology has provided an opportunity for this pervasive anxiety to culminate owing to the fact that modern life is more complicated than it used to be and making friends becomes harder. In this regard, there is a prevailing controversy amongst people that it is more important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends. Personally speaking, I am in favor of this statement. I assert my view for two reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to be mentioned is the value of friendship. When someone is in a long-term relationship that indicates the fact that he owes a valuable treasure called real friendship. To be more specific, old friendships are more valuable owing to the fact that when people are friends with each other for a long time that determines they care about each other a lot and in addition that indicates they know each other; hence they certainly have less conflict with each other due to the fact that they are similar in certain ways. On the other hand, newborn relationships cannot be considered as valuable ones because people involving in this kind of relationship do not care about each other and they do not share any attributes. To convey my notion, let me take a personal example. I have many old friends. Nevertheless, I am a very friendly person and I am able to make new friends with no efforts but I prefer to stay in touch with my old friends rather than spending time with my new friends because I know they care more about me and I am more being loved by them.
Apart from the point discussed above, let assess this statement from the standpoint of the concept of the comfort zone. Researchers have been shown staying in the same position and not be exposed to new circumstances is more promising for people. In other words, people are more comfortable staying in old condition than experiencing new ones. It can be credit for friendships too. People are more willing to be in the same relationship than being exposed to new people. This concept strongly indicates the importance of keeping old friends. Having old friends is less challenging than making new friends for many people. To put this in a more vivid picture, take a child as an example. Imagine his parents have moved to a new city and he lost all of his old friends, it would be hard for him to get out of his comfort zone and become friend with new people in that town. This example could be a practical one due to the fact that many people have experienced it and have witnessed the conflict between the child and his parents about moving to a new environment.
All in all, according to the aforementioned points and examples, the value and ease of having old friends have been settled. However, there is an opposing viewpoint that it is more important to make new friends than keeping old friends but having old friends is not merely more precious but it is also more promising for many people; therefore, I am willing to conclude that it is more important for one to keep his old friends than trying to make new friends.
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 70
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 80
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 68
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...issue has been an inevitable part of an individuals life. The advent of technology has prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e mentioned is the value of friendship. When someone is in a long-term relationship ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2662.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 574.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63763066202 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63988967007 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407665505226 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.2868102346 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.48 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.96 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242867643905 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793872654616 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803391381799 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183261671165 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478927089794 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.