Full time university students spend most of their time behind academic subjects. Some people say that they should engage in other activities also.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is an inevitable truth that education is essential for students to lead a successful life. Some people believe that students should devote maximum time on the academic subjects. However, other's think that extra co-curricular activities are also important and they should involve in that as well. Although, core subjects are necessary but other activities also has great significance.
To embark with, one of the principal aspects of extra activities is that it help students to enhance their creativity and imagination. In other words, core subject teaches students about the fundamentals even though these are not beneficial in practical life. In order to be successful they need to have some extra knowledge apart from basic topics so that they can face the challenges of life and be successful.
Secondly, syllabus of the universities is not updated nowadays, and all the old versions of books are being used to teach people. And also, there are less exercises in coursebooks such as, group projects and case studies which are essential for children to learn team skills and empathy. Extra activities teaches multitude of life skills which helps them to be successful in life.
On the other hand, academic subjects help an individual to learn basic concepts of subjects, namely math and science and these subjects assist them to choose a major subject for their further studies. Unless these subjects are studied, students will not be able to go for specialized studies, and basic subjects also help them to understand their area of interest in alignment to their career prospect.
To conclude, students should not spend all their time on studying their board programs. They should spend their time on extra activities as much as they can because these activities will give them a practical exposure and a better understanding of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-13 | Rina Arora | 90 | view |
- Full time university students spend most of their time behind academic subjects Some people say that they should engage in other activities also To what extend do you agree or disagree 90
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 95
- Some people think young people should follow what elders say. Rest think, young people may have different views than elders. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- 'Unemployment remains the biggest challenge to school- leavers in most countries.'How far do you agree with this assessment? What other challenges face young people today? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun exercises is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ed to teach people. And also, there are less exercises in coursebooks such as, group...
^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...ich are essential for children to learn team skills and empathy. Extra activities te...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 32.9175257732 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 937.175257732 166% => OK
No of words: 299.0 206.0 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70483592911 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 127.690721649 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 290.88556701 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7730181799 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 4.34317383033 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264177235607 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105600534938 0.0766984524023 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883889195289 0.0603063233224 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163542240828 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105399657571 0.0580467560999 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.