Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently the phenomenon of promotion of learning in young people life and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of music is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that the importance of music can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning musical techniques can provide some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of study different techniques of music and several types of music are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a student at the university, I performed an experiment which discovered using music as an important subject leads to sensitive personality. Thus, the beneficial of ramifications of both effective learning methods and suitable learning environments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, using musical methods of teaching might increase the consequences of the effectiveness of music in children life. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of other subjects in schools relate to this reality that the demerits of using only music in teaching methods would pertain to not to learn other skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of being only musical skills is correlated negatively with living skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of other life skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believed that the benefits of music learning in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of creative minds prove the significance of an innovative idea, but also pinpoint happy life implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- Some people say that written communication is better than oral communication.agree or disagree 55
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- cities are now expanding;the government should make better network for public transport aor should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree? 77
- Schools should prepare students for university. rather than for work,' How far do you agree with this statement~ Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations 85
- Involving workers in decision making 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...red using music as an important subject leads to sensitive personality. Thus, the ben...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also pinpoint happy life implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45205479452 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11059967887 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6767228303 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273981153576 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916895503557 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391455792587 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149751975759 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389087837272 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.