By and large, it is established beyond doubt that visiting the museum could easily help people to increase their knowledge about their country. In my opinion, however, the opposite is true. This is due to the fact that people could find any information everywhere, and details which exist in the books will never be found at the museum. In what follows, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons for holding such a view.
The first compelling reason corresponding my idea is that the technology these days is growing fast, and it is very common to find the pictures of anything that exists at the museum on the internet. It is crystal clear that the technology growing spectacularly and makes people find conveniently everything. As a matter of fact, the internet provides a variety of information such as historical places, famous pictures. Moreover, it is fashionable to check the internet to find more relevant information about your country because when you are visiting the specific museum, it doesn’t provide other information that is related together. For example, 2 weeks ago, I have gone to the museum with my family. Although we have enjoyed and had a fun time, we haven’t understood many things because we hadn’t a leader but if we had checked the internet, we have found more concept about our last king. This example clearly illustrates that visiting the museum is not the best way for knowing about our country.
Furthermore, the museums only provide essential information. It is axiomatic that museums only provide information which is so common. In fact, if persons want to learn professionally, they would have to read the books. Moreover, the books provide diversity information about anything and individuals could get lots of knowledge about their country in the books. So, museums only provide information basically but people with reading the specific books would achieve a wide range of data. For instance, the last time I have gone to the museum with my friend is very efficient. Since one of my friends have read about the museum specially and she has told a variety of concepts about each part of the museum. Hence, the visiting of the museum without any additional knowledge doesn’t help you to improve your vision.
By perusing the above paragraphs although many people attend the museum to expand their public recognition, I firmly assert that it is not the best way to recognize our country. This is owing to checking the museum these days is the waste of the time and reading the books can make more details for you. As for this writer’s advice, I vehemently urge individuals to spend most of their time on reading the books instead of visiting the museum for fun.
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting the museums is the best way to learn about a country. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98905908096 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74607739561 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468271334792 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0009207597 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.59090909091 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231424159365 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746407467384 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656368249214 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146839235002 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331935995278 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.