People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Using emotion to make a decision is not recommended, as there very few way to justify it. It makes a person a poor decision maker.
In making decisions in life a person need logic and reasoning more than he/she needs emotion. Though both of them are necessary human characteristics, emotion is only required when people deals with humanity rather than financial problems.
Every step of life people are required to make decisions to go forward. Therefore they need to be in a stable state to make those decisions. Emotional state is an unable state, where people make poorer judgement. But even though when they make decisions in an emotional state, it can not be justified with logic, because logic wasn't used to build it.
In an emotional state any decision undertaken by a person is bound to hurt others- mentally, physically or financially. For example a company manager, when he/she fires an underling just out of anger is making a decision under duress. The underlings financial as well as mental situation is in then jeopardy. Also the company may loose a valuable employee just because the managers couldn't keep it cool. This manager can never justify his/her action afterwards because there is no justification to someones anger.
If someone verbally attack someone else- which is easier in social media- for being racially, politically or theologically different, they are taking a decision out of hatred. Hatred is an extreme emotional state where less logic works than in anger. It could induce hatred inside the victims mind against the attackers group. This decision can not be justified afterwards.
Even though emotion should be considered in check during decisions it is sometime required where logic does not. For example if an low salary operator works for a factory for 30 years and for old age can not provide the same service like before, employer is liable to respectfully terminate him/her. But in this case employer could also take into 30 years of servitude in account emotionally and offer a more suitable, less working position for that person. Also in political situations sometimes emotional decision can bring better result and does not make the decision maker wrong.
It can be concluded that for most of the time in a persons life emotion should impact less than logic before, in decision making as it makes the decision maker's choice invalid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 54
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun way seems to be countable; consider using: 'few ways'.
Suggestion: few ways
...ision is not recommended, as there very few way to justify it. It makes a person a poor...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...quired to make decisions to go forward. Therefore they need to be in a stable state to ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... be justified with logic, because logic wasnt used to build it. In an emotional s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s mental situation is in then jeopardy. Also the company may loose a valuable employ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... in then jeopardy. Also the company may loose a valuable employee just because the ma...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...able employee just because the managers couldnt keep it cool. This manager can never ju...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion can not be justified afterwards. Even though emotion should be considered in check d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 129, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed where logic does not. For example if an low salary operator works for a factory...
^^
Line 13, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...oncluded that for most of the time in a persons life emotion should impact less than lo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06329113924 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63520348137 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526582278481 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1736144749 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300823393539 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998811314951 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663526446687 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172063546357 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444186733732 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.