Many changes have taken place in the world, such as in the field of educations, technologies, standard of living and people way of analyzing the things. As the world's circumstances are not as similar as they were in the past, in the same way people's dependence with their parents has also altered. In my opinion, today's young people have emerged ahead in the field of technology and way of realizing the things that are either right or wrong by themselves in order to apply in life.
At my first blush, youngster in the past were fully based on by parents' ways of handling them. Parents used to play a vital role in young people life. For example, for buying a car the young people used to take the permission from their parents. Parents used to even set the career for the young people thereby administrating the main role in making the decision of younger people. In contrast, these thing are not followed by today'd generations kids, they propose their own resolutions.
Admittedly, technology has changed the preference of people, and they are capable of generating their own solutions. As the Internet is available almost everywhere so the young people choose to google their problem in Internet or in Quora. For supporting instances, people's over Quora are like millions, they are 24/7 online to answer people's questions. They are all well-experienced with broad visualization. Young people like to receive the suggestion from those well-known adviser rather than old generation's narrow minded people of the past.
In fact, the solution given by parents does not meet with the present generations views and ideas. For example, parents aware their children not to watch television as they thought it would effect the vision of their's child. By contrast, Science and technology that had invented a technique which are added in television for the purpose of not hampering children sights. So, those children who agrees with the opinion given by parents as correct will be abandoned by many knowledgeable news and innovations which are pass through the televisions.
From the reason aforementioned, young people are more dependent on the new technologies and development that are taking place in the world. Hence, young people are not influence by the old-generations views which does not match with their's thinking.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 68
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 73
- Has human harmed the earth or made it a better place? 61
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
...ecision of younger people. In contrast, these thing are not followed by todayd generations ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...tch television as they thought it would effect the vision of theirs child. By contrast...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, well, for example, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09947643979 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79806074593 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1433552082 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.526315789 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382244276107 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116687375502 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630809889522 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211465507511 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734202175584 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.