Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to understand to use the land for human needs such as farming, housing, and industry than to save it for endangered animals.
It is a doubt among people whether it is important to use lands for human needs or to save it for endangered animals. Although many people believe that mankind as the best creature of the biological pyramid, has this right to exploit all natural resources, some people proposed that human should save land for endangered animals instead of human needs. I personally suppose that saving other animals habitat is vital and I have a myriad of remarkable reasons for my assertion two of which will be elaborated subsequently.
To begin with, our existence depends on the entity of other species on our planet, without them, we are not able to live longer. There is an impartial relationship among humans, animals, and plants. Any absence or incompletion of any element of the three would cause the unsteady or even collapse of the biosphere. In this life cycle, each tiny movement of us could result in an irreversible impact on other creatures. Therefore, if we keep continuing destroying the species habitat or even make them endangered or extinct, it would be us who ultimately suffer the same as what happened to those extinct animals. Hyena which is in extinction danger is a brilliant example of this issue. They are species called the mayor of nature. They cleaned the nature by eating the animal carcasses. Without them, diffusion of microbial and diseases would be inevitable.
Another equally outstanding reason to be mentioned is that there is no end for human need. Excessive use of natural resources such as the animal 's habitat may make our life more comfortable but it will put our children 's lives into risk for granted. As technology develops, the increase in population, housing rate, and farming will emerge. Thus, so many social problems would happen. The rich parts of society require the majority of the resources to make more money regardless of what catastrophe will happen in future. Therefore, it is better to learn how to sustain our development without interfering to other creatures' areas. To make my point clear, consider wood as an essential reservoir for many industries, by growing these industries via the wealthy class of society, more forests which house many animals turn into deserts. Converting the forest to the desert, not only extinct the animals but also makes serious problems for mankind.
To make a long story short, having discussed the topic from two controversial points of views, it is fair to say that respect to the animal's habitat is necessary since not only does it effects on our existence, but also it helps us to develop our lives in ironic ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... I personally suppose that saving other animals habitat is vital and I have a myriad of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ardless of what catastrophe will happen in future. Therefore, it is better to learn how t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
..., it is fair to say that respect to the animals habitat is necessary since not only doe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...tat is necessary since not only does it effects on our existence, but also it helps us ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: effect
...tat is necessary since not only does it effects on our existence, but also it helps us ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us to develop our lives in ironic ways.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97945205479 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67185821818 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566210045662 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4036685525 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183601037669 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531237492369 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972336092297 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109840955107 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113569202373 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.