The reading states that the most important explanation about sea otter declining is environmental pollution. The professor disagrees with this statement by saying that actually the most significant prompt of sea otters perishing is predators and she opposes each point that made by reading.
First, the reading claims that pollution is more likely the prime cause of sea otters declining than the predators because the sources of pollution are known and they are along the Alaskan coast. The professor refutes this point by saying that if the sea otters are declining because of pollution, they should be found dead in the locations, but no dead bodies were found. However, predators attack the sea otters as their prey and eat them all and no disposal will remain of them.
Second, The reading states that owing to the declining of other mammals, pollution is the main reason. Thus, pollution is killing all mammals including the sea otters. The professor opposes this statement by saying that human hunting orcas' food. Therefore, orcas prefer to hunt other type of animals as their food. Hence, they change their direction to sea otters and other mammals.
Finally, the reading states that where the pollution is present, the sea otters die in the location and vice versa. Hence, this explains the declining of sea otters in specific locations, which leaves an erratic pattern of sea otters declining. The professor does not agree with that, and she says since orcas are monumental and cannot swim in shallow or rocky waters, they only hunt mammals where the water is deep. This event explains why mammals and sea otters are declining in deep water locations and why they remain stable in the shallow water locations.
In conclusion, the professor proves that the reading statements are erroneous and inadequate.
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 76
- TOEFL TPO 09 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TOEFL TPO 13 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- T P O 14 Integrated Writing Task 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13087248322 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44072331686 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48322147651 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8477407676 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388757944677 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143365970608 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885568755563 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198879289866 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111256214713 0.0443174109184 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.