Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of humans and technology modern more and more people tend to explore new things in worldwide and take risks and be different from others in their life to achieve their goals and would change in all of the worlds. One of the most significant ways to change this life in the next years there will be decrease cars in use than there are today, to have two reasons.
In the first place, Cars are great invention today, which make our lives more convenient and easy. Nowadays, almost every family has a car, some even more than one. That is, the number of cars in our world is huge. The great number of cars, in fact, bring us some side effects, which let us feel inconvenient sometimes. Although many would argue that cars are the most importer factor in nation building and the comfort-ability, I think the environment has a far a greater impact to building the country and the people.
The second reason, the huge amount of produced gases from cars will put all human beings’ life in danger. In future, on one hand, most of the international associations will come to an agreement to increase the tax of using cars and on the other hand, they will lower the expanse of public transportation by broadening the new technologies of high-speed trains and buses. Consequently, people find their private automobiles useless. For instance, in my country, there is a city that using public transportation is not only free of charge but also faster. With the advent of new high-speed trains, people can travel at the speed of 300 Km per hours, the fastest train in the world, which brings a huge amount of satisfaction in my city. As a result, these kinds of town will develop in the future and use of these types of cars will be out of date.
In conclusion, it is obvious that I do believe the number of cars will be reduced surprisingly. This is just because of the growing population which brings us terrible traffic jams and also environmental problems that both cause the restriction of cars. I think we should think of another way of transportation in the next twenty years.
- Essay topics: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO_19 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...achieve their goals and would change in all of the worlds. One of the most significant way...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry and the people. The second reason, the huge amount of produced gases from c...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... all human beings' life in danger. In future, on one hand, most of the international...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65343915344 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67997774827 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542328042328 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4329835954 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9375 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212409193251 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683173126138 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645828459573 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118690339519 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417819518046 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.