TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task

The main topic of both the passage and the lecture is about challanges archaeologiy have in the United Kingdom. Considering this, the author claims that archaeology activiites have declined in Bratain espacially afrom the 1950s on. On the contrary, the professor utterly rejects whatever mentioned in the passage through citing new guid line.
First, both the passage and the lecture talk about recent growing construction In Britain. According to the passage, expanation of construction demolish many precious artifacts, because the land was uncoutiously be diging and no one care bout the them. Nontheless, the professor denies and state, the guild line are required builders to examine the land in order to finde artifacts.
Second of all, both the passage and the lecture dicuss financial problems to budget archaeologist. The author goes on to mention that, since the government is the only finance provider for thease kind of exploration, these activities are on a budget. The professor, however, supports the contradictory idea and illustrates, the new reformation has obligated companies to pay for initial observation and preservation, thus the problem has been vanished!
Eventually, both the passage and the lecture dicuss the idea of inadequate jobs for the archeologist. The author claims that, there are no jobs for professional archelogist, unless some limited jobs in government agencies and universitiies. The professor rbutes the author's opinion and says, thanks to the reformation abundant of job have been created. for examle, companies need to recruit archeologies for examination, preservation and other jobs that law obu

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Integrated TOEFL Writing

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...utiously be diging and no one care bout the them. Nontheless, the professor denies and s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...universitiies. The professor rbutes the authors opinion and says, thanks to the reforma...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...tion abundant of job have been created. for examle, companies need to recruit arche...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, kind of, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53571428571 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0595701312 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.789686276 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171618916655 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589450503725 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280509966525 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976148454984 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148903192259 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.