The bar chart provides information regarding the rate of female and male in Australia who doing regular physical activity in different age in 2010
Overall, most rates of women doing regular physical activity exceeded men’s and it experienced an upward trend by the age. But initially, the percentage of women was fall behind men’s rate. Both of two percentages had some fluctuations.
Men was more positive to carry out persistent exercise in age 15 to 24, the rate was 53.9%, being higher than women’s rate by approximately 5%. Then, it deeply declines to 42.2 percent in age 25 to 34 and hitting the low-point of 39.5% in age 35 to 44. However, the figure showed a gradual rising trend to 43.1% in age 45 to 54 and reaching 45.1% in age 55 to 64. Man who is beyond 64 years old had 46.7% consistent physical activity rate.
47.7% of Australian women had regular physical activity in age 15 to 24 which was over 5 percent less than men. Then its outraced men's rate. It grown steadily to 48.9% in age 25 to 34 and increase by 3.6% in age 35 to 44. It gently inclines to 53.3 percent in age 45 to 54 and almost remained constant in age 55 to 64. Finally, there is 47.1 percent of women had consistent exercise in age 65 and over.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53303964758 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63035807402 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.6205754399 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35480918059 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123917171363 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095632405883 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247626917873 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711917733072 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.