Both Reading and listening discuss a problem which birds face. The reading states that people can protect the birds from injuries which stem from glasses and provide several solutions. However, the listening says that these theories won’t work and refutes each author’s reasons.
The first solution which used by article is one way mirror glasses which transparent only one side. If the birds cannot see inside of buildings they will not try to fly inside of them. Hence, they will not injury. On the contrary, the speaker claim that one way glasses won’t stop bird to injury. They are bad as normal glasses. Birds will try to fly through one side glasses since they reflect other side such tree or another.
Secondly, the reading says that the glasses which has colorful design might solve the problem. If people paint regular glasses, it may prevent the birds to fly in it. Conversely, the lecturer say that colorful glasses has also some negative outcome. The birds will see these glasses as open hole and will fly inside of it. Furthermore, these glasses also is not okay for people since they make inside darkness.
Finally, the article posit that people keep the birds away from buildings by using magnetic field. They can use powerful electromagnets which product signals to prevent the birds. In contrast, the professor posit that the idea of magnetic field will not figure out problems. The birds use it when the migrate long distances but in short trip they use their eyes and reflect of shine.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school. Use specific reasons to support your answer. 70
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 60
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Imagine that you are preparing for a holiday. You plan to be away from your home for a week. In addition to clothing and personal care items, you can take one additional thing. What would you take and why? Use specific reasons and details to support your 60
- Every generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different from your parents’ generation? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: as
...tcome. The birds will see these glasses as as open hole and will fly inside of it. Fu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ure out problems. The birds use it when the migrate long distances but in short trip they u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99606299213 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27803114089 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6288130871 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.5 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1111111111 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257449852432 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842822405023 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690551318423 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143549460766 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909958925131 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.