Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds and its presence can be seen everywhere. It penetrates every aspects of human life and has changed people's lifestyle. I believe that e-books and devices powered by artificial intelligence will supersede paper materials in future. This essay will show this by looking at how applicable and environmentally friendly these gadgets are.
To begin with, the technology-driven appliances are more portable than heavy paper books. Consider a smart wristwatch , for instance, it can be synced with personal computer or cellphone so you can have all your photos, e-books and contacts right there on your wrist. It is their lightweight and multi-functionality gravitating most individuals. Thus, these technological devices will replace the old-fashioned hard-cover books because of their applicability.
Secondly, state of the art gadgets can use solar power to be charged, so they have less detrimental effects on the environment. For producing offset books , for example, many trees should be cut which can have a devastating impact on the planet. Many environmentalists strive to stop publishing of paper materials in order to save the earth. Therefore, Many people are tantalized to turn their study habits into reading e-books and e-journals.
However, the proponents of traditional paper books and newspapers claim that these stuff are the part of study habit of people and can not be replaced completely. As an illustration, many people are used to reading daily newspapers while drinking morning coffee. Detaching individuals from this habit is not an easy task. Hence, the futuristic appliances will not be able to pose threat to the existence of traditional periodicals.
As mentioned aforesaid, as modern technological instruments are multi-functional and Eco-friendly, a fair number of people are opt to replace paper-based materials with them. As a matter of fact, I am a strong advocate of this trend because its merits override its drawbacks. In conclusion, I hope that all people endeavor to leave their abortive habits aside causing problems for our planet.
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lligence will supersede paper materials in future. This essay will show this by looking a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...paper books. Consider a smart wristwatch , for instance, it can be synced with per...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...se of their applicability. Secondly, state of the art gadgets can use solar power to be charg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... environment. For producing offset books , for example, many trees should be cut w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48929663609 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28643823443 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611620795107 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9761770673 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4736842105 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181008144015 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525601426847 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486925616279 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101474845759 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380168270625 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.