Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of designing the building and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern cities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a friendly office environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, positive impacts on people's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of well-educated employees, as well as modern architecture, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the urban texture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-designed towers and increasing life expectancy apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, negative impacts on humans' work might increase the consequences of social satisfaction. Moreover, fundamental aspects of under-developed countries would relate to this reality that the demerits of dingy houses pertain to the city environment. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of designing modern structures is correlated negatively with old-fashioned offices. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of traditional designs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of facilitated buildings far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hard-working employees prove the significance of well-equipped offices, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end? 77
- Criminals in prisons are dealing with new cases, and some are teaching them. Which method is more effective to reduce the crime rate? Rehabilitation or punishment? Give examples. 80
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- For governments and organizations, what is a critical global problem and what is thesolution? 88
- Some say that music/movie is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82307692308 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41580039049 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676923076923 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0277688114 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212546794571 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613663580578 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537345702119 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104366097634 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295022061287 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.