The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewable in the year 2009.
The pie chart illustrates the contribution of different sectors in producing electricity during 2009 by Germany and France, in percentage. Also what and how much several renewable were used are depicted in a separate pie chart.
To begin with, Germany manufactured 560 billion kWh of electricity from the conventional thermal procedure (59.6%), nuclear reactor (23.0%) and renewable (17.4%). Among 17.4% of renewable, 39.3% came from biomass, 36.9% were using wind, hydroelectricity procreated 17.7%, lastly, solar power originated 6.1%.
On the contrary, France mass produced 510 billion kWh of electricity utilizing 76%, 10.3% and 13.7% from nuclear plants, conventional thermal and renewable respectively. Moreover, hydroelectricity (80.5%), wind (10.5%), biomass (8.1%) and solar power (0.9%) had contributed in originating 13.7% of renewable.
To sum up, the German government mainly concentrated on the conventional thermal procedure, whereas France, as a nation, prefers nuclear power plants. Also, biomass and wind are stapled renewable sources for German, whereas, France employed hydroelectricity as main. Surprisingly, none of them put geothermal energy in use for producing electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-02 | a.m.anikce | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 61
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sport and participation in different sports in the UK from 2008 to 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 11
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewable in the year 2009 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...9 by Germany and France, in percentage. Also what and how much several renewables we...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, so, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05294117647 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27283566456 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682352941176 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3879647599 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229072559619 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936377786913 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825865307389 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139555584382 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754647771399 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 11.4140731707 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.