Human behavior, being the subject of debate for years, is assumed to be prone to external forces rather than the production of sheer self. As critical as free will can be, environment and biology are intrinsically involved. Observing the simplest exhibition of behavior would yield results revealing how inevitable indispensable the outer influence is.
One consistent and obvious manifestation of influenced human behavior is peer impact. People from a particular group or speech community tend to act similarly. This indicates that the individuals share common features that binds them together. The most influential or dominant individual is likely to cast his or her preferences onto other individuals belonging to the same group. In this way, individuals find themselves complying with the requirement of their group, or otherwise they will have to confront the possibility of being denied or casted away. The latter is commonly known as peer pressure as well where one party overshadows the other. In this vein, behavior is molded by a set of lobbying experiences.
Another natural factor is purely biological. Where environment does not reach, leaving a blind spot, genetics interfere and dictate. Scientific evidence has brought forth many times and tackled how shaping DNA can be. Unlike environment, genetics is much more directive and less subtle. Children can be observed to recirculate their parents behavior. Often times, children seem to seize their physical features to practise ticks that are not acquired but rather genetically passed down. Families from the same dynasties handle particular situations in the same way their dead ancestors did, leaving no room for the possibility of learned behavior.
While circumstantial impact and biological factors are the primary interferences in human behavior, acknowledging the free will of people is unquestionable. For ages, it has been believed that the dividing distinction between the human beings and animals is drawn by unconditioned nature of mankind. In the hopes of this very resisting belief, the human race has not only been able to understand the universe and decipher its wonders but also to interact, alter, and even control what is within reach. Dismantling this belief is damaging to the will power that fuels the human experience. Nevertheless, being skeptical of the sensibility of conditioned and externally influenced behavior is pointless to say the least.
Regardless of any emotionally-based orientation toward this subject, the degree to which environment and genetics may affect human behavior can yet be discussed; disregarding such influence, however, is unrealistic and extreme. The assertiveness of the author that manifests in the statement is justifiable by how sound and concrete his viewpoint is.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: arzoo
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, well, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52913752914 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07757109797 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613053613054 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5875226594 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818263231697 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216835983132 0.0831039109588 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213794877136 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467120249115 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00818878956814 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.