This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001
The figure above reveals the results of a survey carried out to determine graduate's status in full-time employment specific for each gender during these six years period from 1995 to 2001.
At the first glance, it can be seen that in the majority of these years men rather than women lucky to get their adequate occupations a part from 2001 which experienced an equal amount for males and females. The highest percentage of this figure devote to the year 2000 for both genders. Approximately, more over 84 percentage of male and just very small under 82 percentage.
Nonetheless, this statistic had experienced the least stage at the first year of this research. By the time past, it can be anticipated that for the future phase both males and females reach to a similar point. Maybe for now in which the survey did not gather the data have insignificant erratic behavior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-13 | saeed2751366 | 91 | view |
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
- In the modern world there is a movement away from written exams to more practical assessment.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 56
- This bar chart shows the percentage of Australian graduates on full-time employment four months after graduation, between 1995 and 2001 89
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nonetheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67670328659 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7468985576 43.030603864 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370328487137 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129303594295 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216233875614 0.0843802449381 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325432418136 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.391968910725 0.0819641961636 478% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.