Computerized Voting System
The lecture covers the downsides of automatizing the voting process.
It states that though traditional voting system has room for human errors and miscount of votes, the automatized system also could result in miscounts due to ‘human errors’, maybe in programming, and on one hand the recounts through the traditional systems are indeed time-consuming and tedious, the automatic system would, if it malfunctions, result in loss of the voting data which can be irreversible.
The lecture also points to the fact that not everyone is accustomed to using computer-based technologies, a sudden shift towards automation of the voting system could scare off the not so tech savvy voters. The passage also mentions the banking system’s dependence on technology and the ease and comfort with which it is used nowadays, it goes on to suggest that this could imply that even the voters would be comfortable with an automatized voting system. The lecture opposes this perspective by stating that the banking system has come a long way and it had a very large number of trials to consolidate to what it is today. The banking system has had a large sample of data to modify and correct its system to reach the efficiency it has reached today. The same would not hold true for the voting system since the data sample size would be small as elections are held every few years, while the banking system functions every day.
Using the arguments above the lecture by evaluating and contradicting the points presented in the passage states the disadvantages of shifting towards the automatic voting system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-14 | Pri_Judy | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- All results of publicly funded scientific studies should be made available to the general public free of charge. Scientific journals that charge a subscription or newsstand price are profiting unfairly. 50
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college" 50
- Cetadone, a new therapy for the treatment of addiction to the illegal drug tarocaine, has been proven effective in a study by Regis Hospital in the western part of New Portsmouth. The study involved local tarocaine addicts who responded to a newspaper ad 69
- The Chevalier's memoirs. 81
- Invest in unmanned space exploration. 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...able with an automatized voting system. The lecture opposes this perspective by sta...
^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...als to consolidate to what it is today. The banking system has had a large sample o...
^^^
Line 5, column 761, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ch the efficiency it has reached today. The same would not hold true for the voting...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11363636364 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8741090367 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526515151515 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.7506527393 49.2860985944 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.75 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354488487168 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170537478587 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515255504842 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219517775801 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621784163379 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.7273730684 196% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.