TPO50
The passage claims that some problems to trip in mars, but in the lecture, the professor talks about the solutions that made in the passage.
Firstly, the passage talks about the cost of time that needs to travel in mars is too long and it is hard to obtain food, water, and oxygen for humans. However, the professor made the solution by using the hydroponic method, growing plants in the water, humans could obtain food for themselves, they also use again the water of these plants, and plants make oxygen from carbon dioxide. Therefore, this problem will be easily solved.
Secondly, the passage claims that being a long time in zero-gravity causes many problems to humans, especially their muscle weakens and bones become smaller and fragile. Nevertheless, the professor makes this point by exercising regularly humans make their muscles strong and by using calcium a lot make their bones strong.
Finally, the passage made this point that space radiation is very dangerous for humans, and spaceship needs a heavy shield to prevent this radiation. The professor, thereby, made this point that space radiation is not always in dangerous level since sun makes it occasionally. They can use some complex instrument to measure the level of this wind. When the device recognizes it, and all astronauts use their shield separately. Therefore, no need to utilize a heavy shield.
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- TPO50 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07929515419 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48303447948 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.276315673 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0341225774222 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0121870263649 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200662328542 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0198902950935 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228375687292 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.