In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?
With the development of urbanization, some people argue that cities’ surroundings must be preserved from further construction and new buildings. I partly agree with this assertion; while it may be beneficial in the case of many situations, others seem to be detrimental for cities.
On the one hand, the advancement in technology that has driven urban sprawl in developed countries have certainly contributed to the requirement of additional vacancies for residents. For example, immigration from rural areas to megacities in terms of finding adequate employment or educational opportunities has extremely increased the population of these cities. As a result, these communities by constructing new accommodation would be able to tolerate such a staggering rate of population. Furthermore, when it comes to traffic congestion or air pollution, in city centers, expanding inhabitants in neighboring is likely to tackle these issues.
On the other hand, in some cases the conservation of the countryside should be considered as a vital action. At the first place, environmental manipulation by constructors can lead to many disastrous phenomena, accelerate a number of natural disasters for human beings. For example, the reason behind rising in floods or even drought could be due to indulgence in defrostration or removing agricultural lands which result in global warming. Additionally, governments must invest in providing suitable infrastructure as well as transportation to accommodate their resident’s needs that would be highly costly. Finally, removing natural environments and being engrossed in Urbanism can bring a great deal of reluctances for people to not be conscious about the Earth.
In conclusion, constructing new houses in provinces brings some benefits for communities, however the drawbacks of destroying surrounding lands cannot be neglected
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
- You missed a flight due to a problem at the airport Write a letter to the airline In your letter Describe what happened that caused you to miss the flight Explain how missing your flight affected you Make it clear what you would like the airline to do 89
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport. Discuss both vie 89
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? 73
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79783393502 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49899772096 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660649819495 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1126278695 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0833333333 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105646691058 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406030940412 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295651221082 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722315472374 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200537546656 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.